Month: March 2014

Icons, Dead Christians, and Prayer Requests

“Why is it ok to pray to saints,” the question began. The writer was intrigued by the Catholic and Orthodox practice, but had been told by others that, “It is wrong to pray to anyone but God.” There followed a question about the use of icons in prayer, and how in the world a painted picture could be an instrument of spiritual life.

The common and easy answer is that dead Christians aren’t dead. They are alive in Christ, and just as we can ask someone with skin on to pray for us, we can also ask someone with skin off, so to speak.

I would just add one thing: whoever said, “It is wrong to pray to anyone but God,” is confusing worship and prayer. It is wrong to worship anyone but God. This is clear from Scripture. But to ask or petition someone else for something is perfectly fine. To ask or petition – this is precisely what “pray” means: “Pray tell me, what is the time?” No one is disturbed if you “pray” to someone to tell you the time of day.

We ask people to intercede for us before God all the time – “Hey, will you pray for me about my job interview tomorrow?” What we mean is, “I am asking you to join me in asking God to move on my behalf regarding my job interview tomorrow.” It isn’t because you have skin on that I can ask you to pray for me. It’s because we share a common unity in Christ. Those who have died in the flesh are not dead, Jesus says, but alive in God (Mt. 22.31-33). Paul says to be absent from the body is to be present with Christ (2 Co. 5.8f).

Let me explain it like this. When a person dies, where is that person? “Present with Christ,” is the answer. OK. Now, when I become a believer, where am I? “In Christ” is the answer. I’m in Christ and St. Nicholas is in Christ, so I can ask him to pray for me.

That is the “what” of the matter. As to the “how” of the matter – I don’t have a clue – heavenly voicemail? Heck, I don’t even know how the internet happens.
As for using icons – they are “windows into heaven,” so to speak. Funny, a modern Protestant can sit for three hours and watch Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ and see it as a vehicle of increased devotion, and turn right around and have trouble with a painted (or “written”) icon doing the same.

Using icons in spiritual devotion isn’t a new thing. It has a history going back to the early church. There is evidence of their use in the 200’s, and by the 300’s icons were prevalent. In other words, using icons in the Christian spiritual life predates the canonization of Scripture by a good 150-200 years! Wrap your mind around that – before a pastor could say, “Turn in your Bibles to the fourth Gospel,” he could say, “Be sure and light a candle in front of the icon of Jesus and pray for our church.” The last great Ecumenical Council (Nicea II in A.D. 787) dealt with the issue of icons. There were some Christians who were dissing the use of icons and the council of Christian leaders officially affirmed their use in prayer.

So, just a bit more – the Greek word eikon is translated as “image”; Jesus is the “express image” of the invisible God, the Bible says. Eikon originally meant “the image in which the original is contained.” With that in mind, we can see icons as, in a sense, “containing” what they depict (Christ, some saint, some event from the life of Jesus). That’s confusing to us moderns until we think about – get this – icons on a smart phone. Click on the icon and it takes you to the program. The icon on the screen is an “image” of the program, and in a way “contains” the program. Now, apply the same idea to an icon used in devotion. Yes, it is “just” an image, but it connects us to the reality behind it.

Saint Jerome gets the final words: “If the Apostles and Martyrs, while still in the body, can pray for others, at a time when they must still be anxious for themselves, how much more after their crowns, victories, and triumphs are won! One man, Moses, obtains from God pardon for six hundred thousand men in arms; and Stephen, the imitator of the Lord, and the first martyr in Christ, begs forgiveness for his persecutors; and shall their power be less after having begun to be with Christ? The Apostle Paul declares that two hundred three score and sixteen souls, sailing with him, were freely given him; and, after he is dissolved and has begun to be with Christ, shall he close his lips, and not be able to utter a word in behalf of those who throughout the whole world believed at his preaching of the Gospel?” (Against Vigilantius, Paragraph 6).

St. Jerome, pray for us to understand the Bible and the faith more than we do.

The Freedom of Form

Someone wrote and asked about the “order of worship” and a Quaker fellow suggested that no order was the best order. I politely disagreed. And wrote…

First, order is important. It has been important since the get-go of recorded biblical history.

Second, the order isn’t for us. It isn’t what makes us happy, or most fulfilled, or what we find most meaningful. Worship isn’t for us. It is for God. We should be asking, “How would God like the worship to be?” instead of, “Wonder what we could do that would make people excited about this and draw a bigger crowd?”

Third, there is a basic pattern that emerges in Scripture and historic worship:

  1. Entrance (gathering in the name of the Lord with a focus on worshiping him)
  2. Word (time is spent to read Scripture, hear it taught, sing in response to Word, and pray)
  3. Table (focus on Holy Communion, the “gifts of God for the people of God.”)
  4. Dismissal (a deliberate sending forth of the people to continue doing the ministry of Christ)

Those who suggest that form is antithetical to freedom have perhaps never thought it through. The Genesis account has the first three days of creation as God “forming” and the last three days as God “filling.” Form precedes filling (you don’t fill up a jug until you have a jug to fill up). Having form isn’t antithetical to having the Spirit and life – form and Spirit go hand in hand.

Example: a football game. Good Lord, how formal it is! We know exactly how many team members on the field at each time. We know exactly how many yards are required to make a first down. We know exactly how far for a touchdown. We know all kinds of rules and regulations, not to mention prescribed uniforms and padding. There are even guys called referees out on the field making sure everyone plays by the rules.

Terribly formal. Must be a boring game.

But tell that to 10,000 screaming fans on a Friday Night in West Texas.

Form doesn’t negate freedom, it ensures it.

Salvation, Faith, Works, and That Whole Mess

Someone wrote a question about whether faith alone was enough for salvation, or whether works were necessary too. Now, that’s an age old question over which whole denominations have become two whole denominations. Talking about it at all is like walking through a mine field. But I’m pretty sure we’ll just all blow ourselves to kingdom come unless we start out with some definitions.

Now, the first definition – no, the only definition – that most people offer is a definition of the word works. Are works necessary to salvation? Well, buddy, how do you define works? Oh, I define works as saying no to sin, repenting, doing good things, praying, giving, you know – that sort of thing.

Hmmm.

However, I don’t think the definition for “works” is the most important one in the discussion. I think the definition for salvation is much more important.

What do we mean when we say “saved”?

Saved, in the Bible, is sozo. It means three different things:

  • to be rescued
  • to be healed
  • to be brought to wholeness and completeness.

One might ask, “Saved from what?” And some people would mistakenly say, “Saved from God’s punishment.” But it isn’t God we need saving from, he’s the one who does the saving. What we need saving from is (a) sin, and (b) death, and (c) the screwed up consequences of our sinfulness.

So, God becomes flesh – lives, dies, and rises again – in a movement to save (sozo – rescue) us.

But it doesn’t end there – the end goal is not just rescue – but  sozo – being healed, being brought to wholeness and completeness; that is, restoration. God desires us to be, in the words of Paul, “conformed to the image of his Son” (Romans 8.29). God desires us to be like him. And that involves change. That comes through process, and through union with him.

So, what is salvation? It is the defeating of sin and death through union with God and being conformed to Christ.

Now, with that definition, ask the question again – Are actions necessary for salvation?